
Lord was questioned about a complaint made by survivor Arsen Ostrovsky about a video posted on YouTube. Ostrovsky was attacked online after an image showing blood streaming from a wound in his head was posted on social media two hours after he was shot.
Lord said the decision to allow the video to remain on YouTube had been reviewed at “quite senior levels”.
“We have spent a lot of time thinking about where we draw the line and we continue to re-evaluate where we are doing that,” Lord said.
Richard Lancaster, the lawyer leading the inquiry’s evidence, referred to a transcript of the video to avoid showing the images in public.

Don't Miss:
-
No immunity: how Xi’s anti-corruption fighters are zeroing in on fresh targets
-
Book about Putin’s private life which ‘reads like a spy novel’ wins French literary prize
-
Africa knows who its true friends are – and they’re not in Washington
-
Trump says China is driving anger at US data centres. These residents disagree
-
US Secret Service aware of Iranian video threat to assassinate Barron Trump

The ‘Islamic NATO’ Is Not NATO
The Northern Sea Route: China’s Emerging Alternative to Suez
Southeast Asia’s Fragmented Environmental Governance