Thailand’s Ambitions To Become A Regional Air Hub 
Ana Malinow on National Single Payer and Democratic Party off Ramps 
America First — But who decides what that means? Iatrogenic harm and the Court of Protection
Court proceedings can cause unintended harm to the person at the centre of the case (“P”) as well as to P’s family, and to P’s…
Transparency
A statement on the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Re Gardner (Deceased) (Court of Protection: Disclosure of Position Statements)
By the core team of the Open Justice Court of Protection Project, 9th June 2026 On 21 May 2026, the Court of Appeal handed down…
Anorexia, declaratory protection and the Mental Health Act: Ventilating a jurisdictional question following Townsend
Given the likelihood of an upcoming Supreme Court hearing, it may be that Townsend provides a very slender thread on which to base the Trust’s…
Fit for discharge and still in hospital five months later due to delay with eating and drinking plan
There’ s a deceptively simple solution to enable P to leave hospital – the development of an eating and drinking plan – but a complex…
Judge refuses to make Civil Restraint Order against P’s father
By Celia Kitzinger, 30th March 2026 A Court of Protection judge has refused an application from South Tyneside Council to make a Civil Restraint Order…
“Open Justice is not open sesame” Court of Appeal told in court document disclosure case
According to the appellant, an “urban myth” had developed about the application of the ‘open justice’ principle to Court of Protection hearings. Flowing from that…