
Who is at fault for the notice: the frontline officers involved or the senior civil servant overseeing them?
Advertisement
“Opinions are divided among ourselves,” said a veteran civil servant, speaking on condition of anonymity. “In this case, the senior official can say this was an execution problem by frontline staff. Such a high-ranking official doesn’t micromanage to this level.”
But another said: “Can the head truly shrug off supervisory accountability? It may depend on whether he or she turned a blind eye to questionable practices. But it’s hard to prove.”
Advertisement
The new mechanism targets department heads for “widespread, repetitive, systemic” failures, aiming to clarify administrative blame.
Former ministers, high-ranking bureaucrats and political observers pointed to the practical challenges of attributing responsibility amid scandals, and questioned the government’s decision not to make it a legal requirement to publish full investigation results.

Don't Miss:
-
How China’s industrial tourism boom is creating a new generation of tech-savvy children
-
Middle East states eye transport resilience with new logistics corridor to bypass Hormuz
-
Singapore’s safe-haven status draws more Chinese capital into property sector
-
It’s not ecotourism if it risks damaging Hong Kong’s natural assets
-
How unlicensed mainland Chinese tour groups cash in on Hong Kong campsites

Vietnam at 51
Arizona gun shop owner faces terrorism-related charges for allegedly selling high-caliber weapons bound for Mexican cartels
Linda Pentz Gunter on the Case Against Nuclear Power