The committee’s leading senior counsel, Victor Dawes, noted in his opening speech that the Labour Department, the Fire Services Department and the Housing Bureau’s Independent Checking Unit (ICU) all denied it was their responsibility to ensure the building materials used in the HK$336 million project met required fireproof standards.
Advertisement
When residents’ repeated complaints forced authorities to conduct inspections, the contractor, having been tipped off in advance, partially replaced substandard combustible protective nets used at the site with fire-retardant ones.
“Why would such a major fire happen in Hong Kong, known as an advanced city and for its world-class infrastructure, and why hadn’t the government and contractors been notified of the series of failures and mistakes?” Dawes said.
Advertisement
“This fire has revealed unacceptable systemic failings that cannot be overlooked.”


Don't Miss:
-
The peacock throne’s gambit: Iran’s Reza Pahlavi plans to flip the script on Beijing
-
Israel PM says Iran can no longer enrich uranium, hints at ‘ground component’ to war
-
US-China split on digital money deepens as stablecoin debate stalls Clarity Act
-
Trump talks with Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi off to positive start
-
US F-35 hit by suspected Iranian fire, forced to make emergency landing

Questions swirl around US plans for record $15B Prince Group crypto seizure
Donate to ICIJ
Chelsea FC fined millions over secret payments under Abramovich ownership