
Wrapping up the government’s arguments at an independent committee inquiry into the tragedy, Jenkin Suen SC on Thursday attributed the inferno to the “deceit, inaction and deliberate omission” of contractors who exploited regulatory regimes founded on the trust and confidence that authorities had placed in the private sector.
Suen acknowledged that the disaster had exposed systemic vulnerabilities, including the government’s overreliance on professional self-regulation, insufficient oversight, gaps in guidelines and interdepartmental miscommunication, as well as an inability to apply technology to detect malpractice.
But he warned against characterising “weaknesses” and “room for improvement” in the system as the primary causes of the fire, saying the legislative framework had been developed in response to sustained calls in society to streamline regulatory procedures, reduce compliance costs and avoid disproportionate requirements for low-risk construction works.
“The government can understand why authorities’ failures are often subject to strict public scrutiny, but one must not lose sight of other stakeholders,” he said.

Don't Miss:
-
Rotela Clan
-
Driver claims India’s eco-friendly fuel damaged his car. Court agrees
-
Anthropic, China and why Pax Silica architect thinks the US can keep the AI lead
-
Philippine military assures ‘no vacuum’ over top officer’s retirement
-
Italian court sentences ex-highway chief to 12 years’ jail over Genoa bridge disaster

Can Small Modular Reactors Make Nuclear Work in Southeast Asia
West Virginia State Senate Race Comes Down to Two Words — Data Centers
Press Still 0, Singapore Government Unanimous in Court