
British publication The Economist has come under fire across social media for calling China an “eco-authoritarian” state over its Yangtze River fishing ban, with some users calling out the outlet for its use of the “but at what cost” trope.
“The Chinese Communist Party, once famous for pillaging from the natural world, has set to protecting parts of it. But the country’s ‘eco-authoritarian’ approach deserves scrutiny,” The Economist said in a social media post linking to the article.
The article describes the government’s environmental approach as “top-down and intolerant of resistance” and alleges that at times officials did not listen to environmentalists or the people harmed by the policies.
The Economist article acknowledged the results of the recovery efforts, stating that the river was making a “remarkable comeback” and could offer a lesson for other degraded watercourses in Asia.

Don't Miss:
-
China needs monkeys: lab animal shortage could hinder biotech growth
-
Trump slams Australia’s social media crackdown as ‘extortion’
-
Hong Kong a ‘2-way springboard’ between mainland China and world: John Lee
-
Taiwan waits for its new F-16s, still stuck in Hawaii after a fortnight’s delay
-
Singapore police question 5 over racist comments on Nepal floods, Air India investment

Khazak President Tokayev’s Influence may extend beyond his Term
Philippines Pushes back as China narrative on Batanes Grows
US-South Korea Alliance Faces a Test beyond Political Rhetoric