Exclusive
China Leapfrogs into Global Biotech China Leapfrogs into Global Biotech Tension in One of Asia’s Flashpoints Tension in One of Asia’s Flashpoints From Gibraltar to the Arctic From Gibraltar to the Arctic
Current Affairs

But at what cost? The Economist draws backlash over ‘eco-authoritarian’ China label

British publication The Economist has come under fire across social media for calling China an “eco-authoritarian” state over its Yangtze River fishing ban, with some…

By Samantha Johnson / July 31, 2026

British publication The Economist has come under fire across social media for calling China an “eco-authoritarian” state over its Yangtze River fishing ban, with some users calling out the outlet for its use of the “but at what cost” trope.

In a piece published on July 27, the publication outlined China’s efforts to restore Asia’s longest waterway, which has experienced decades of environmental degradation, leading to a decline in fish and other species populations.

“The Chinese Communist Party, once famous for pillaging from the natural world, has set to protecting parts of it. But the country’s ‘eco-authoritarian’ approach deserves scrutiny,” The Economist said in a social media post linking to the article.

The article describes the government’s environmental approach as “top-down and intolerant of resistance” and alleges that at times officials did not listen to environmentalists or the people harmed by the policies.

In 2021, China imposed a 10-year fishing ban along with other measures in an attempt to restore the Yangtze River. A paper published by an international team in the peer-reviewed journal Science in February found that only half a decade on, the river was already undergoing a meaningful recovery.

The Economist article acknowledged the results of the recovery efforts, stating that the river was making a “remarkable comeback” and could offer a lesson for other degraded watercourses in Asia.

Don't Miss: