
British publication The Economist has come under fire across social media for calling China an “eco-authoritarian” state over its Yangtze River fishing ban, with some users calling out the outlet for its use of the “but at what cost” trope.
“The Chinese Communist Party, once famous for pillaging from the natural world, has set to protecting parts of it. But the country’s ‘eco-authoritarian’ approach deserves scrutiny,” The Economist said in a social media post linking to the article.
The article describes the government’s environmental approach as “top-down and intolerant of resistance” and alleges that at times officials did not listen to environmentalists or the people harmed by the policies.
The Economist article acknowledged the results of the recovery efforts, stating that the river was making a “remarkable comeback” and could offer a lesson for other degraded watercourses in Asia.

Don't Miss:
-
China urges ‘constructive dialogue’ with EU in high-level call with France
-
Hong Kong airport builds third runway with strategy to help marine environment thrive
-
Cambodia, Thailand take US$300 billion seabed dispute to UN
-
Hong Kong visitor arrivals hit post-pandemic monthly high in August
-
Indonesian finance minister found out about his firing in mid-meeting phone call

When Great Powers Talk, Who Speaks for Asia
About the China Capital investigation
Frequently asked questions about the China Capital investigation