
After years of debate over whether claw and pinball machines encourage high-stakes gambling, Hong Kong has finally proposed stricter oversight to curb gaming, particularly among teenagers.
Cases of addiction linked to these machines are rising in the city, but drawing a clear distinction between gaming and gambling remains difficult.
As Hong Kong prepares to amend relevant laws, the South China Morning Post examines how other jurisdictions regulate the trend and asks an expert from an addiction counselling centre whether their approaches could work locally.
1. Why and how Hong Kong is stepping up regulation
Claw machine shops have proliferated across Hong Kong, particularly after a 2022 court ruling that operators were not required to obtain a public entertainment licence
Advertisement
These businesses have evolved to offer high-value prizes. Some pinball machine shops have also been accused of cashing out rewards through “gift redemption” or “private buy-backs”, attracting customers to spend large sums of money or extended periods of time.
The addictive nature of such machines, often marketed as amusement, has prompted the government to propose bringing them – along with other prize-based amusement games – under a licensing regime, the Home and Youth Affairs Bureau said on Monday.
Advertisement
Currently, licence holders must cap spending at HK$5 (64 US cents) per play and limit prize values to HK$300 or below. Proposed regulatory measures also include requiring operators to display warning notices about addiction risks.

Don't Miss:
-
EU and China need a grand bargain to avoid a trade war
-
2 Japanese held in China over alleged rare earths smuggling
-
Hidden cost of China’s electric car boom, record-breaking week for sales: 7 EV reads
-
Singaporean woman jailed for slapping, punching helper over job performance
-
Keiko Fujimori edges closer to winning Peru’s presidency

Indonesia’s Gathering Economic and Political Storm
Cyprus anti-corruption watchdog refers former president to prosecutors for alleged ‘abuse of power’
US-Vietnam 2030: The Architecture of Alignment Without Alliance