An 8-1 High Court majority sided with a Christian counsellor who argues the law banning talk therapy violates the First Amendment. The justices agreed that the law raises free speech concerns and sent it back to a lower court to decide if it meets a legal standard that few laws pass.
Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the court, said the law “censors speech based on viewpoint”. The First Amendment, he wrote, “stands as a shield against any effort to enforce orthodoxy in thought or speech in this country”.
Advertisement
In a solo dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote that states should be free to regulate healthcare, even if that means incidental restrictions on speech. The decision, Jackson wrote, “opens a dangerous can of worms” that “threatens to impair states’ ability to regulate the provision of medical care in any respect”.
The decision is the latest in a line of recent cases in which the justices have backed claims of religious discrimination while taking a sceptical view of LGBTQ+ rights.


Don't Miss:
-
Vance and Rubio emerge as early contenders to inherit Trump’s Republican Party
-
India raises diesel, petrol prices for third time in 8 days, amid tense US-Iran ceasefire
-
Is China building the world’s largest naval support ship?
-
Three Mexican Meth Cooks Arrested at Drug Lab in Nigeria
-
New Zealand to invest almost US$1 billion in drones, ships to protect maritime security

Trump, Xi, and a Defining Moment for the World
David Lapp on the Case Against Forcing Residential Consumers to Pay for Skyrocketing Data Center Costs
Elizabeth Burch on the Dark Side of the Tort Bar