Singapore Clamps Down on Foreign Interference Involving South Asians 
The Dark Side of Asia’s ‘Miracle Diet’ 
Thailand Seeks to Revive Its Peninsular White Elephant An 8-1 High Court majority sided with a Christian counsellor who argues the law banning talk therapy violates the First Amendment. The justices agreed that the law raises free speech concerns and sent it back to a lower court to decide if it meets a legal standard that few laws pass.
Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the court, said the law “censors speech based on viewpoint”. The First Amendment, he wrote, “stands as a shield against any effort to enforce orthodoxy in thought or speech in this country”.
Advertisement
In a solo dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote that states should be free to regulate healthcare, even if that means incidental restrictions on speech. The decision, Jackson wrote, “opens a dangerous can of worms” that “threatens to impair states’ ability to regulate the provision of medical care in any respect”.
The decision is the latest in a line of recent cases in which the justices have backed claims of religious discrimination while taking a sceptical view of LGBTQ+ rights.
Don't Miss:
-
China’s space start-ups eye IPO boom as SpaceX heads for record listing
-
China’s BYD claims Germany’s plug-in hybrid crown, disrupting market of iconic auto giants
-
Hacking of Philippine Senate’s website spotlights widening political crisis
-
Fury over Jared Kushner’s Albania resort project threatens to engulf political elite
-
China leads US in everyday AI apps but firms are overvalued, experts say