An 8-1 High Court majority sided with a Christian counsellor who argues the law banning talk therapy violates the First Amendment. The justices agreed that the law raises free speech concerns and sent it back to a lower court to decide if it meets a legal standard that few laws pass.
Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the court, said the law “censors speech based on viewpoint”. The First Amendment, he wrote, “stands as a shield against any effort to enforce orthodoxy in thought or speech in this country”.
Advertisement
In a solo dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote that states should be free to regulate healthcare, even if that means incidental restrictions on speech. The decision, Jackson wrote, “opens a dangerous can of worms” that “threatens to impair states’ ability to regulate the provision of medical care in any respect”.
The decision is the latest in a line of recent cases in which the justices have backed claims of religious discrimination while taking a sceptical view of LGBTQ+ rights.


Don't Miss:
-
US revokes temporary sanctions waiver on Iranian oil after vessels attacked in Hormuz
-
Ten Chapitos Gunmen Killed in Government Operations in Rosario, Sinaloa
-
Colombia’s president-elect suspends transition after outgoing leader Petro’s fraud claims
-
Cardinal in Morocco steps back from duties after sexual assault claims
-
Trump still ‘disappointed’ with Nato, says US should control Greenland as summit kicks off

Taiwanese authorities charge executives who helped China’s cyber spies target ICIJ network
Who Killed Father Diệp — and Who Gets to Decide?
Duterte Impeachment Puts 2028 Race — and Philippine Institutions — on Trial