
Geopolitical competition has long been understood in territorial terms. Power was measured by control over land, resources and populations. Rivalry was expressed through military confrontation, alliance formation and the defence of borders. As economic interdependence deepened in the 20th century, globalisation was seen as an arena within which states competed, but not itself the object of competition.
That assumption no longer holds. Increasingly, the infrastructure of globalisation is becoming the central arena in which geopolitical rivalry unfolds.
Advertisement
This shift has been partly driven by globalisation itself. As production, transport and finance have become more interconnected, vulnerabilities have multiplied. Supply dependencies, network concentration and geographic chokepoints have created new forms of leverage, often less visible than military force, but no less consequential.
Advertisement
States do not simply seek to strengthen their position, but to shape the environment in which their rivals operate. Influence is exerted not only by building capacity, but by controlling access, redirecting flows and introducing friction into the networks on which others depend.

Don't Miss:
-
Hong Kong issues amber rainstorm warning as storms follow record heat
-
Young South Koreans embrace ‘plogging’ to cope with climate anxiety
-
Son of James Handy’s girlfriend charged with murder of ‘Top Gun’ actor
-
Why North Korea’s Kim is doubling down on nuclear might as Xi visit looms
-
Does Pete Hegseth’s volte-face on China reflect an America in decline?

Chinese spies are posing as recruiters to target officials and journalists
Genocide the Non Profit Industrial Complex and the Democratic Party
Uncomfortable Undertones in Lee’s Sweep of South Korean Polls