
Geopolitical competition has long been understood in territorial terms. Power was measured by control over land, resources and populations. Rivalry was expressed through military confrontation, alliance formation and the defence of borders. As economic interdependence deepened in the 20th century, globalisation was seen as an arena within which states competed, but not itself the object of competition.
That assumption no longer holds. Increasingly, the infrastructure of globalisation is becoming the central arena in which geopolitical rivalry unfolds.
Advertisement
This shift has been partly driven by globalisation itself. As production, transport and finance have become more interconnected, vulnerabilities have multiplied. Supply dependencies, network concentration and geographic chokepoints have created new forms of leverage, often less visible than military force, but no less consequential.
Advertisement
States do not simply seek to strengthen their position, but to shape the environment in which their rivals operate. Influence is exerted not only by building capacity, but by controlling access, redirecting flows and introducing friction into the networks on which others depend.

Don't Miss:
-
Israel targets ‘terrorist’ in southern Syria; Damascus condemns attack
-
7 dead in UK after vehicle travelling in wrong direction hits police car
-
Ukrainian drones kill at least 10, hit warehouse of Russian online retailer Ozon
-
Canada’s PM hits back with new US tariffs after trade talks fail
-
Elderly woman allegedly pressured into spending HK$100,000 on beauty products

After Years of Waiting, Noel Tata Presides Unchallenged over India’s Biggest Business
Despite years of confiscations, the Met still holds hundreds of pieces linked to alleged trafficking and looting figures
Ex-Evergrande Boss Hui Ka Yan gets Life in Prison