
Geopolitical competition has long been understood in territorial terms. Power was measured by control over land, resources and populations. Rivalry was expressed through military confrontation, alliance formation and the defence of borders. As economic interdependence deepened in the 20th century, globalisation was seen as an arena within which states competed, but not itself the object of competition.
That assumption no longer holds. Increasingly, the infrastructure of globalisation is becoming the central arena in which geopolitical rivalry unfolds.
Advertisement
This shift has been partly driven by globalisation itself. As production, transport and finance have become more interconnected, vulnerabilities have multiplied. Supply dependencies, network concentration and geographic chokepoints have created new forms of leverage, often less visible than military force, but no less consequential.
Advertisement
States do not simply seek to strengthen their position, but to shape the environment in which their rivals operate. Influence is exerted not only by building capacity, but by controlling access, redirecting flows and introducing friction into the networks on which others depend.

Don't Miss:
-
Vance and Rubio emerge as early contenders to inherit Trump’s Republican Party
-
India raises diesel, petrol prices for third time in 8 days, amid tense US-Iran ceasefire
-
Is China building the world’s largest naval support ship?
-
Three Mexican Meth Cooks Arrested at Drug Lab in Nigeria
-
New Zealand to invest almost US$1 billion in drones, ships to protect maritime security

Trump, Xi, and a Defining Moment for the World
David Lapp on the Case Against Forcing Residential Consumers to Pay for Skyrocketing Data Center Costs
Elizabeth Burch on the Dark Side of the Tort Bar