
Geopolitical competition has long been understood in territorial terms. Power was measured by control over land, resources and populations. Rivalry was expressed through military confrontation, alliance formation and the defence of borders. As economic interdependence deepened in the 20th century, globalisation was seen as an arena within which states competed, but not itself the object of competition.
That assumption no longer holds. Increasingly, the infrastructure of globalisation is becoming the central arena in which geopolitical rivalry unfolds.
Advertisement
This shift has been partly driven by globalisation itself. As production, transport and finance have become more interconnected, vulnerabilities have multiplied. Supply dependencies, network concentration and geographic chokepoints have created new forms of leverage, often less visible than military force, but no less consequential.
Advertisement
States do not simply seek to strengthen their position, but to shape the environment in which their rivals operate. Influence is exerted not only by building capacity, but by controlling access, redirecting flows and introducing friction into the networks on which others depend.

Don't Miss:
-
Egypt sentences TV presenter, 11 others to death in drugs case
-
2 pilots killed after Greek air force plane crashes at annual air show
-
US ambassador calls violent Israeli settlers ‘terrorists’ after weeks of West Bank unrest
-
US ‘disables’ or ‘destroys’ 3 Iran oil tankers after warships targeted
-
Hong Kong’s first astronaut Lai Ka-ying to give live lecture from space

RECAP: Asia Sentinel Stories for August 2026
Taiwan’s Habit of Releasing Soldiers’ Full Names Seems Risky
White House pick to run Venezuela oil deal under investigation in two countries