Egyptian court orders closure of news site Mada Masr and fines editor Lina Attalah, sparking international outcry 
Indonesia’s Nuclear Deal with Russia is Fraught with Concerns 
Amazon mining boss wanted by Brazil for sheltering Jair Bolsonaro’s spy chief has businesses, properties in Florida 
Known as voir dire, the process allows the presiding judge and two legal teams to question prospective jurors before the trial begins to identify possible bias and conflicts that could impede their ability to adjudicate the case in a “fair and impartial” way.
Richard Gabriel, president of litigation strategy firm Decision Analysis, said the high-profile nature of the case, eight years in the making, and its links to both China and Iran elevated the stakes of voir dire for both sides.
“Given the nature of the case, its pre-trial publicity and potential international ramifications, they seemed to want to ask [prospective jurors] many questions to get a better sense of where they are coming from,” he said, referring to a questionnaire that was circulated among hundreds of prospective jurors before the trial.
Don't Miss:
-
“El Chorejas” Arrested in Morelos! Alleged Leader of Los Aparicio Detained
-
Human Remains Found in Black Bags in Paso Morelos, Huitzuco
-
They Arrived From Texas With $365,000 in Undeclared Cash; They’re Facing Charges in Oaxaca
-
Inside Costa Rica’s Highway Robbery Business | The InSight Take
-
Journalism in Mexico: Anatomy of a silence