How Hungary’s richest man funneled millions into Orbán’s propaganda machine 
How Real Is the US Withdrawal from the Middle East? 
From Iran to China: An Emerging Trans-Central Asian Corridor 
Nuclear containment and regional ceasefires are the most viable entry points for potential negotiations between Washington and Tehran, according to a prominent Chinese expert on the Middle East.
Niu Xinchun, director of the China-Arab Research Institute at Ningxia University, said the escalating conflict had vindicated China’s insistence on diplomatic and political solutions as the only way forward.
He said that although both the US and Iran were open to talks – with Washington “in a much greater hurry” – progress depended on substantial concessions to narrow the divide between their public positions.
Advertisement
“The most likely areas for concessions start with a ceasefire and the nuclear issues,” he said, citing the Iran nuclear deal signed in 2015 as a precedent.
Washington withdrew from the deal in 2018 under Donald Trump’s first presidential term, claiming the agreement failed to curb Iran’s missile programme and regional influence. Tehran began exceeding the limits on its nuclear programme a year later.
Advertisement
“Before the conflict broke out, Iran explicitly stated that the nuclear issue was on the table, whereas their missile programme and regional proxy issues were not. Iran’s policy hasn’t changed – they are still willing to discuss the nuclear programme,” Niu said.
Don't Miss:
-
US wraps up military mission in Iraq, giving Baghdad room to strengthen China ties
-
As China and the EU begin crunch trade talks, optimism is in short supply
-
Data centre opposition is growing in Australia. Is there a middle ground?
-
Helper arrested for allegedly slapping 5-year-old boy after he refuses to eat
-
Workers, mostly Indian, building US consulate in Milan agree to record settlement