
He said that although both the US and Iran were open to talks – with Washington “in a much greater hurry” – progress depended on substantial concessions to narrow the divide between their public positions.
Advertisement
Washington withdrew from the deal in 2018 under Donald Trump’s first presidential term, claiming the agreement failed to curb Iran’s missile programme and regional influence. Tehran began exceeding the limits on its nuclear programme a year later.
Advertisement
“Before the conflict broke out, Iran explicitly stated that the nuclear issue was on the table, whereas their missile programme and regional proxy issues were not. Iran’s policy hasn’t changed – they are still willing to discuss the nuclear programme,” Niu said.

Don't Miss:
-
As Philippines battles fuel crisis, will Marcos postpone Asean summit?
-
Hong Kong home prices surge to near 2-year high, but Iran war clouds outlook
-
Google’s Gemini AI app debuts in Hong Kong
-
Hong Kong slams UK for undermining city’s rule of law with calls to release Jimmy Lai
-
As haze returns to Singapore, is crisis ‘quietly accepted’ by Asean as inevitable?

Canada revokes dozens of crypto firms’ registrations
Questions swirl around US plans for record $15B Prince Group crypto seizure
Donate to ICIJ