There are two important ways to avoid misunderstanding and make the board of trade an effective mechanism – not only for engagement but also for action.
First, both sides should take the time to agree on a detailed mandate, rather than papering it over or leaving that discussion for another day. Second, the US should apply the lessons of what worked and what did not work in past bilateral economic engagement bodies, including the Strategic and Economic Dialogue and Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade.
Advertisement
It is one thing to determine what falls into the basket of sensitive trade. It is a whole other thing to develop a list of non-sensitive sectors and products.
Advertisement


Don't Miss:
-
Hong Kong finance chief says economy grew in third quarter, warns of external risks
-
Despite rising yields and political gridlock, France not facing a debt crisis: analysts
-
Nobel Chemistry Prize awarded to Henri B. Kagan and Kenso Soai
-
Ex-Buddhist monk who founded Thai Aids hospice convicted of embezzlement
-
Nasa releases striking image of dawn on Mars

How Real Is the US Withdrawal from the Middle East?
From Iran to China: An Emerging Trans-Central Asian Corridor
New documents show how a retail chain’s sales practices helped put guns on US streets