There are two important ways to avoid misunderstanding and make the board of trade an effective mechanism – not only for engagement but also for action.
First, both sides should take the time to agree on a detailed mandate, rather than papering it over or leaving that discussion for another day. Second, the US should apply the lessons of what worked and what did not work in past bilateral economic engagement bodies, including the Strategic and Economic Dialogue and Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade.
Advertisement
It is one thing to determine what falls into the basket of sensitive trade. It is a whole other thing to develop a list of non-sensitive sectors and products.
Advertisement


Don't Miss:
-
Israeli far-right ministers want ‘return to war in Lebanon’ despite peace talks
-
Wang Fuk Court family bid final farewell after salvaging remains of their home
-
Chip prodigy Da Bo returns to China after his role in TSMC’s 3nm plant in Japan
-
Hong Kong-based Jardine Matheson buys Australian diagnostic group I-MED for US$2.4 billion
-
India orders new deportation centres days after BJP election victory

Singapore Court to Rule on Bloomberg Defamation Suit
Trump, Xi, and a Defining Moment for the World
David Lapp on the Case Against Forcing Residential Consumers to Pay for Skyrocketing Data Center Costs