
Yet behind the high-profile ship launches, experts say quieter changes in pilot recruitment, command structures and fleet integration point to a carrier doctrine distinct from the American model.
“The biggest misconception among Western analysts is the tendency to evaluate the [Chinese navy] through the doctrinal mirror of the US Navy,” said Brendan Mulvaney, director of the China Aerospace Studies Institute.
“Just because they have the same kinds of equipment doesn’t mean they will use it in the same way as the US. Their goals, missions and challenges are different than ours; they will come up with Chinese solutions to Chinese problems.”
China’s carrier force is evolving under strategic conditions unlike those that shaped the American naval doctrine of using carriers to project power thousands of kilometres from home.

Don't Miss:
-
Hong Kong’s five-year plan: what’s at stake?
-
Why does Hong Kong need a 5-year plan – and will it crimp its free-market economy?
-
Vietnam’s To Lam eyes trade, defence boost during trip to Australia, New Zealand
-
North Korea launches a suspected ballistic missile, Japan says
-
The InSight Take: Abelardo de la Espriella Inherits Colombia’s Fractured Criminal Landscape

Why Yemen’s War Keeps Reproducing Itself
Alleged cartel boss Daniel Kinahan charged in Ireland following high security extradition
Taiwan Places Bets on Sea Drones