
The gaffe at last month’s Aids 2026 conference in Rio de Janeiro, where a US State Department presentation displayed a map of Africa with every country mislabelled, serves as more than a source of embarrassment. It was a potent symbol of the distance between Washington’s rhetoric and its real stance regarding the African continent.
Earlier this year, Nick Checker, a senior US State Department official, spoke of “resetting” US relations with Africa, pivoting away from dependency and towards mutually beneficial partnerships. Yet, as the mislabelled map suggests, the actual engagement often feels disconnected, chaotic and transactional.
This pattern echoed throughout the Cold War era. Washington’s support for many brutal and corrupt regimes was often dictated by narrow geopolitical interests rather than the aspirations of African citizens, and this continues to this day.

Don't Miss:
-
No immunity: how Xi’s anti-corruption fighters are zeroing in on fresh targets
-
Book about Putin’s private life which ‘reads like a spy novel’ wins French literary prize
-
Trump says China is driving anger at US data centres. These residents disagree
-
US Secret Service aware of Iranian video threat to assassinate Barron Trump
-
The InSight Take: Organized Crime Adopts the Latest Technologies in the Drone-IED Arms Race

The ‘Islamic NATO’ Is Not NATO
The Northern Sea Route: China’s Emerging Alternative to Suez
Southeast Asia’s Fragmented Environmental Governance